Résumé sections

Should I put "references available upon request" on a résumé?

Leave it off

Cut the line. It states the default and spends a line doing it.


Why it costs you

Every employer knows they can ask for references, and no candidate has ever refused. The sentence therefore carries no information: it announces a fact that was already true and would have been true had you written nothing. What it does carry is a faint signal about the writer, because it is the most recognisable piece of résumé boilerplate still in circulation, and a reader who has seen a thousand of them registers it as filler rather than thoroughness.

What to put there instead

Delete it and give the line to work. If a posting asks for references, supply them on a separate sheet with each name, title, employer, your relationship to them and how long you worked together, formatted to match your résumé so the two read as one document. Ask each person first, and tell them which role you have applied for, so the call does not arrive cold. Keeping the sheet separate is also the courteous handling of other people’s contact details, which otherwise end up in applicant systems neither you nor they can audit or delete.

When the usual advice is wrong

Write something in that space only when the reference itself is unusual and material: a named referee the reader would recognise, or a role where references from a specific institution are part of the qualification. Even then, name the person rather than announcing the availability of unnamed people.

A worked example

Before

References available upon request.


After

(nothing: the line is deleted, and one more bullet moves up the page)

Removing it costs no information and returns a line to the part of the document that is actually read.


Common questions

Should I put "references available upon request" on a résumé?
Cut the line. It states the default and spends a line doing it. Delete it and give the line to work. If a posting asks for references, supply them on a separate sheet with each name, title, employer, your relationship to them and how long you worked together, formatted to match your résumé so the two read as one document. Ask each person first, and tell them which role you have applied for, so the call does not arrive cold. Keeping the sheet separate is also the courteous handling of other people’s contact details, which otherwise end up in applicant systems neither you nor they can audit or delete.
Why does ""references available upon request"" weaken a résumé?
Every employer knows they can ask for references, and no candidate has ever refused. The sentence therefore carries no information: it announces a fact that was already true and would have been true had you written nothing. What it does carry is a faint signal about the writer, because it is the most recognisable piece of résumé boilerplate still in circulation, and a reader who has seen a thousand of them registers it as filler rather than thoroughness.
When is it right to keep it?
Write something in that space only when the reference itself is unusual and material: a named referee the reader would recognise, or a role where references from a specific institution are part of the qualification. Even then, name the person rather than announcing the availability of unnamed people.

Where this is corroborated

These career services publish guidance on this section. Each was read and checked to actually address it. They establish that the question is taken seriously; the argument above is ours.


Other sections

Words worth fixing while you are in there

After the résumé

Deciding what goes on the page is the quick part.

The slow part is filling in the same forty fields on the fortieth application. Approve the jobs and we get them applied to, with a confirmation saved for each one. Free tier is 25 a month, no card, and a credit is only spent once a submission is confirmed.